Drawing for INTERNETCROSSING GLOBAL MEDIA NETWORK

USPTO serial 78797394

INTERNETCROSSING GLOBAL MEDIA NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERNETCROSSING GLOBAL MEDIA NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacie K. Smith

STACIE K SMITH FENNEMORE CRAIG3003 N CENTRAL AVE STE 2600PHOENIX, AZ 85012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business advertising and marketing services, namely, providing services using the application of Internet search behaviors and patterns to make business decisionsACTIVE—
042Providing online, non-downloadable software which tracks, reports and analyzes web site traffic and on-line marketing, assesses effectiveness and reallocates resources, and for creating advertisements and distributing the advertisements over the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 4, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 10, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 28, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 3, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance