USPTO serial 78797601
LOCAL LABEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOCAL LABEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H HOLT
WILLIAM H HOLT LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM H HOLT12311 HARBOR DRIVEWOODBRIDGE, VA 22192UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Hats; Polo shirts; Shirts; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |