Drawing for AIRZONE

USPTO serial 78798198

AIRZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Buchenhorner

MICHAEL J BUCHENHORNER HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP701 BRICKELL AVE STE 3000MIAMI, FL 33131-2898UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Climate control systems consisting of digital thermostats, air conditioning, heating, ventilation and drying control devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 9, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 26, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 26, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 18, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 28, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 28, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 28, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 28, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance