USPTO serial 78798223
WILPAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WILPAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Forest Park, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank S. Benjamin
FRANK S BENJAMIN MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP303 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5300ATLANTA, GA 30308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Logistics management in the field of packaging and transportation; business consulting services relating to product distribution, operations management; services, logistics, supply chain, production systems and distribution solutions; packaging articles to the order and specification of others; merchandise packaging; business merchandising display services; marketing services, namely providing information on product display; information management services, namely, shipment processing, preparing shipping documents and invoices, tracking documents, packages and freight over computer networks, intranets and internets; monitoring and tracking of package shipments; transportation logistics services, namely, planning and scheduling shipments for others | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2005 |
| 039 | Transportation and delivery services, namely, transportation delivery of goods for others; wrapping services for baggage protection during travel; packaging articles for transportation; warehousing services, namely, storage, distribution, pick-up, and packing for shipment of goods and packages of others; supply chain, logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of goods for others by air, rail, ship or truck | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2005 |
| 040 | Contract manufacturing in the field of packaging | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2005 |
| 042 | Packaging design for others; designing of packaging and wrapping materials | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |