USPTO serial 78798486
SIGMA FOODSERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIGMA FOODSERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert B. Kimball, Jr.
ALBERT B KIMBALL JR BRACEWELL & GIULIANI LLP711 LOUISIANA ST STE 2300HOUSTON, TX 77002-2770UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cold meats and prepared meat product, namely, hams, sausages, chorizo, mortadella, bologna, salami, bacon, pastrami, loin, turkey breast, pig's feet, sliced beef, pork sausage, roast beef, pepperoni, cheeses, dairy products namely cream, milk-based beverages containing, poultry meat, beef, mutton and goat meat; seafood, namely shrimps, prawns, lobster, oysters, octopus, squid, crab, clams, and snail; dried fruits, soups, fried potatoes, potato chips, processed peanuts, prepared nuts, canned olives, processed chili peppers, processed vegetables, canned beans, yogurt, unflavored and unsweetened gelatins, marmalades, eggs, milk, frozen prepared food based on poultry meat, prepared food based on fish and seafood and hot dogs | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca pudding, sago, coffee substitutes, cereal based snack foods, namely, breakfast cereal and cereal food bars, bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, sweets, choclates, candies, chewing gum and lollipops, salt, mustard, vinegar, and spices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |