Drawing for 1776 INDEPENDENCE REALTY

USPTO serial 78798594

1776 INDEPENDENCE REALTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1776 INDEPENDENCE REALTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karin M. Krchnak

Karin M. Krchnak 9912 FERNWOOD RDBETHESDA, MD 20817-1604Bethesda, MD 20817UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Real estate marketing services, namely, on-line services featuring tours of residential and commercial real estate; Real estate sales managementACTIVE—
036Operating marketplaces for sellers of goods and/or services; Providing information in the field of real estate by means of linking the web site to other web sites featuring real estate information; Real estate agencies; Real estate brokerage; Real estate consultancy; Real estate listing; Real estate management; Real estate management consultation; Real estate multiple listing services; Real estate syndicationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 19, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 11, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2008PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Mar 31, 2008PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 31, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 27, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 27, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 9, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 6, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance