USPTO serial 78799012
FLASHTRONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLASHTRONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Hudak, Jr.
DANIEL J HUDAK JR HUDAK, SHUNK & FARINE CO LPA2020 FRONT ST STE 307CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH 44221-3256UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic locking-state indicators for vehicular couplings; electronic sensors, namely, for measuring, recording or transmitting information and electronic switches, namely, for measuring recording or transmitting information; electrical connectors; mounting devices, namely, for components of trailer couplings and position indicators; magnetic elements, namely, magnetic switches and magnetic sensors; electronic indicator devices, namely, position indicators; light emitting diodes and light emitting diode displays; electrical and acoustic alarm devices, namely, alarms for identifying the state of an electronic sensor or electronic switch, accumulators and housings therefor; energy storage devices, namely, batteries | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Trailer couplings for vehicles, namely, fifth wheel couplings and components, and bolt couplings and components; pull-grip handle and operating handles for trailer couplings; housings for ground vehicle parts, namely, fifth wheel trailer couplings, trailer sensors and switches, and position indicators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |