USPTO serial 78799240
THINK AS ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THINK AS ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Murray, Esq.
Peter D. Murray, Esq. Cooper & Dunham LLP30 Rockefeller Plaza 20th FloorNew York, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photocopying machines; photographic cameras; digital cameras; photographic projectors; facsimile machines; telecommunications transmitters; computer software for operating electronic copying machines, ink-jet printers and laser-beam printers; electronic copying machines with functions of printer, scanner and facsimile machine, their parts and fittings not including ink cartridges; ink-jet printers; laser-beam printers; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of brochures and catalogs in the field of printers, facsimile machines, electronic copying machines with multi-functions of printers, scanner and facsimile machine and computer software for electronic copying machines and printers | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair and maintenance of photographic machines and apparatus; repair and maintenance of office machines and apparatus, namely, electronic copying machines, digital cameras and scanners; repair and maintenance of electronic copying machines with functions of printer, scanner and facsimile machines; repair and maintenance of ink-jet printers and apparatus; repair and maintenance of laser-beam printers and apparatus; repair and maintenance of facsimile machines and apparatus; repair and maintenance of telecommunication machines and apparatus; repair and maintenance of integrated circuits manufacturing machines and systems; repair and maintenance of semiconductor manufacturing machines and systems; clock and watch repair or maintenance, consultancy regarding the maintenance of computer systems for electronic copying machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design, programming and maintenance of computer software for electronic copying machines; technical advice relating to performance and operation of machines that require high levels of personal knowledge, skill or experience of the operators to meet the required accuracy in operating them, namely, electronic copying machines, printers, scanners, facsimile machines, electronic copying machines with multi-functions of printer, scanner and facsimile machine, and digital cameras; consultancy regarding design and creation of computer systems for electronic copying machines; rental of computers; providing on-line non-downloadable software for connecting personal computers with printers, facsimile machines and electronic copying machines with multi-functions of printer, scanner and facsimile machine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ricoh Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Ricoh Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THINK AS ONE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |