Drawing for HEMO-HALT

USPTO serial 78799434

HEMO-HALT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEMO-HALT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William R. Trueba, Jr.

William R. Trueba, Jr. Espinosa | Trueba PL3001 SW 3rd AvenueMiami, FL 33129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005wound dressings for use in blood clottingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 27, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 4, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 4, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 4, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 4, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 4, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 23, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 26, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 27, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2006INOAAMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance