Drawing for P PAYLESS

USPTO serial 78799454

P PAYLESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with P PAYLESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Carroll

Robert M. Carroll Collective Brands, Inc. - Law Department3231 SE 6th StreetTopeka, KS 66607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail shoe and fashion accessories store services; computerized on-line retail store services in the field of footwear, apparel, purses, handbags, and backpacks, accessible via global computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 23, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 6, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 5, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance