USPTO serial 78799459
SECURE EBILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECURE EBILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kanata, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael K. Bosworth
MICHAEL K BOSWORTH BUCHANAN INGERSOLL LLPPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, on-line payment gateway software for processing and transmitting bill payment data over the internet for use by on-line retailers, on-line auction sites and their customers, and printed documentation provided therewith as a package | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Electronic payment, namely, processing and transmitting bill payment data in the nature of hosting a secure on-line billing gateway for receiving order information, generating invoices, processing payment information and creating and forwarding receipts relating to purchse of goods and services on the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |