USPTO serial 78799879
LOS OSUNA REPOSADO 100% AGAVE AZUL MEXICO 38% ALC. VOL. DESDE 1876 CONT. NET. 750 ML.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3891488Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2010
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LOS OSUNA REPOSADO 100% AGAVE AZUL MEXICO 38% ALC. VOL. DESDE 1876 CONT. NET. 750 ML.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VINATA SANTA CLARA, S.A. DE C.V.
MAZATLAN, MX
VINATA SANTA CLARA, S.A. DE C.V.
MAZATLAN, MX
VINATA SANTA CLARA, S.A. DE C.V.
MAZATLAN, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dwayne K. Goetzel
Dwayne K. Goetzel Meyertons, Hood, Kivlin, Kowert & Goetzel, P.C.P.O. Box 398Austin, TX 78767-0398UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverage produced from a brewed malt base with natural flavors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 3, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VINATA SANTA CLARA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by VINATA SANTA CLARA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by VINATA SANTA CLARA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named LOS OSUNA REPOSADO 100% AGAVE AZUL MEXICO 38% ALC. VOL. DESDE 1876 CONT. NET. 750 ML.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |