Drawing for CX-1

USPTO serial 78800179

CX-1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CX-1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristina M. Foudray

KRISTINA M FOUDRAY HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON PCPO BOX 2902-0902MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobiles and structural parts thereof, but excluding tires; engines for automobiles, but excluding their parts; motors and engines for land vehicles, but excluding their parts; suspension systems for automobiles; shock absorbers and shock absorbing springs for land vehicle suspension systems; drive shafts and axles for land vehicles; wheel bearings and shaft couplings for land vehicles; transmissions for land vehicles; brakes for land vehicles; anti-theft alarms for vehiclesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 17, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance