USPTO serial 78800700
RAINXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAINXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BARRIE, ONTARIO, CA
BARRIE, ONTARIO, CA
Royal Group Technologies Limited
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank P. Farfan
WOODBRIDGE ONTARIO L4L 8Z7ROYAL GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED1 ROYAL GATE BLVD,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metal gutter systems comprised of non-metal gutter sections, hangars, joiners, corner members, end caps, drop outlets, downspouts, elbows, divertors, mounting clips, fascia boards, fascia angle adaptors, fascia fixers, leaf screens and drip edges | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EURAMAX CANADA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GSW BUILDING PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Group Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named RAINXPRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 25, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |