USPTO serial 78800716
BRAY S.A.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAY S.A.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Einstein Progetti E Prodotti S.p.A.
San Giovanni in Persiceto (BO), IT
Other trademarks owned by Einstein Progetti E Prodotti S.p.A.
Einstein Progetti E Prodotti S.p.A.
San Giovanni in Persiceto (BO), IT
Other trademarks owned by Einstein Progetti E Prodotti S.p.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Goldberg
RICHARD M GOLDBERG GOLDBERG PATENT LAW OFFICE25 E SALEM ST STE 419HACKENSACK, NJ 07601-7416UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, NECKTIES, BELTS, SWEATERS, CARDIGANS, PULLOVERS, SWEATSHIRTS, WAISTCOATS, T-SHIRTS, JACKETS, BLOUSONS, OVERCOATS, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, PANTYHOSE, VESTS, TANK TOPS, SLEEPWEAR, PAJAMAS, SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, GOLF SHIRTS, COATS, SHORTS, BERMUDA SHORTS, GYM SHORTS, SWEAT SHORTS, PANTS, JEANS, RAINCOATS, SASHES, WARM-UP PANTS, WARM-UP SUITS AND DRESSES, HEADBANDS, BANDANAS, BLOUSES, SUITS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, SHAWLS, SCARVES, GLOVES, FUR COATS, FUR JACKETS, FUR STOLES; BEACHWEAR NAMELY, BATHING CAPS, SHORTS, COATS, BATHING SUITS, SLIPS, BATH ROBES, UNDERWEAR, NAMELY, CAMISOLES, PETTICOATS, CORSETS, UNDERSHIRTS, UNDERPANTS, SLIPS, BRIEFS; LEATHER CLOTHING, NAMELY, JACKETS, COATS, PANTS, BELTS, WAISTCOATS, SKIRTS; IMITATION LEATHER CLOTHING, NAMELY, JACKETS, COATS, PANTS, BELTS, WAISTCOATS, SKIRTS; HEADGEAR, NAMELY, HATS, CAPS, VISORS; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SHOES, SNEAKERS, SANDALS, BEACH SANDALS, SLIPPERS, BOOTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |