USPTO serial 78801087
MASTRAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASTRAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sujata Chaudhri
SUJATA CHAUDHRI COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | FOOD STORAGE BAG CLIPPERS IN THE NATURE OF BAG CLOSURES MADE OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | ELECTRIC EGG BEATERS, ELECTRIC CHOPPING MACHINES, ELECTRIC MIXERS FOR HOUSEHOLD AND PROFESSIONAL KITCHEN USE, ELECTRIC TIN OPENERS, ELECTRIC CITRUS FRUIT PRESSES FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, ELECTRIC FOOD PROCESSORS, ELECTRIC ICE-CREAM CHURNS, ELECTRIC JUICE EXTRACTORS, EDIBLE PASTES MAKING MACHINES, ELECTRIC GRATING MACHINES, ELECTRIC COFFEE MILLS, ELECTRIC FOODSHAKERS, ELECTRIC KNIVES, ELECTRIC GARLIC SQUEEZERS, ELECTRIC WHISKS FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | MORTARS, CARVING KNIVES, KITCHEN KNIVES AND BLADED PICKS; HAND OPERATED VEGETABLE PEELERS; KITCHEN FORKS, KITCHEN SPOONS, KNIVES AND ZESTERS; TABLEWARE, NAMELY, KNIVES, FORKS AND SPOONS; HAND OPERATED NUT CRACKERS; HAND OPERATED TIN OPENERS; BAG CUTTING SCISSORS; HAND SLICERS; FISHBONE TWEEZERS; HAND PIZZA CUTTERS; HAND CHEESE CUTTERS; HAND CHOPPERS; HAND CITRUS FRUIT CUTTERS; HAND FRUIT PEELERS; HAND FOOD PUNCHES; HOUSEHOLD KNIVES; HAND SCISSORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | MEASURING GLASSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | REFRIGERATORS, FREEZERS, ELECTRIC COOKING RINGS, PLATE WARMERS, ELECTRIC KETTLES, ELECTRIC COFFEE MACHINES, ELECTRIC ESPRESSO MACHINES, ELECTRIC TOASTERS, ELECTRIC WAFFLE IRONS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE, ELECTRIC EGG BOILERS, ICE MACHINES, ICE-CUBE MACHINES, ELECTRIC COOKING PROBES, TAP WATER PURIFIERS, ELECTRIC TEAPOTS FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | FOOD STORAGE BAG CLIPPERS IN THE NATURE OF BAG CLOSURES MADE OF NON-METAL AND NOT MADE OF PAPER | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | GLOVES FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, ICE-CUBES BUCKETS, SALAD BOWLS, EGG CUPS, CORKSCREWS, BOWLS, SALAD SPINNERS, VINAIGRETTE STIRRERS, MULTIGRATER MANDOLINS, NAMELY, APPARATUS FOR CUTTING AND GRATING VEGETABLES AND FRUITS, NON-ELECTRIC ICE-CREAM CHURNS, BULB SHAPED BASTERS FOR SAUCES, HOUSEHOLD BRUSHES, CAKE PANS, ICE-CREAM MOULDS, SKIMMERS, WINE SERVERS, WINE COOLERS, NON-ELECTRIC STEAMERS, CLOTHES PEGS, CUTTING BOARDS, INSULATED BOTTLES, FUNNELS, TRAYS, RACKS, BASKETS AND BINS FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, KITCHEN CONTAINERS, JARS, JUGS, GLASS STOPPERS, CAP-POURERS, CHAMPAGNE STOPPERS AND POURERS, GLASS MARKERS, NAMELY, CHARMS FOR ATTACHMENT TO BEVERAGE GLASSWARE FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES, SPICE MILLS, VEGETABLE MILLS, LADLES, SPATULAS, ROLLING PINS, WHISKS, CAP OPENERS, BOTTLE OPENERS, PASTRY BRUSHES, SPRAY ATOMIZERS, GARLIC PRESSES, SERVING PLATES FOR KEEPING FOODS COLD, DUSTERS, KITCHEN TURNERS IN THE NATURE OF SPATULA, HAND OPERATED ICE CREAM SCOOPS, COFFEE TONGS, HAND GRATERS, NON-ELECTRIC EGG BOILERS IN THE NATURE OF A POT FORM, COOKING FORKS, SERVING SPOONS AND FORKS, PLASTIC KITCHEN CONTAINERS, PLASTIC KITCHEN BOWLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | HAND TOWELS, PLACEMATS MADE OF TEXTILE OR SILICONE; NAPKINS MADE OF TEXTILE OR PAPER, OVEN MITTS, BARBECUE MITTS, OVEN GLOVES, BARBECUE GLOVES, TEXTILE POT HOLDERS, TABLE MATS NOT MADE OF PAPER | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CHEF HATS AND OVERALLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mastrad S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Mastrad S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MASTRAD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |