Drawing for IN2MOVIES

USPTO serial 78801129

IN2MOVIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IN2MOVIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet A. Kobrin

Janet A. Kobrin WARNER BROS.4000 WARNER BOULEVARDBRIDGE BUILDING NORTH, 5TH FLOORBURBANK, CA 91522

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of live-action, comedy, drama and animated television series; distribution and display of live-action, comedy, drama and animated motion picture theatrical films; internet services, namely, providing information via an electronic global computer network in the field of entertainment relating specifically to music, movies, and television; providing entertainment, and educational information via a global computer network; providing information for and actual entertainment via an electronic global communications network in the nature of live-action, comedy, drama and animated programs and production of live-action, comedy, drama and animated motion picture films for distribution via a global computer network; providing news on the subjects of entertainment, music, sports, cultural events and current events and providing general interest entertainment programming and content via computer networksACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Sep 24, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Sep 15, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Sep 15, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Mar 6, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Mar 6, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Sep 25, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Sep 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Mar 26, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Mar 26, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 2, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Oct 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Feb 13, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Feb 13, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILEDโ€”
Feb 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Feb 12, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
Feb 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
Feb 5, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Feb 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Jan 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jan 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Oct 2, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERYโ€”
Sep 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Sep 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Sep 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Aug 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Aug 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Aug 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Aug 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jul 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jul 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Feb 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance