Drawing for MILLER HEIMAN SOLUTION SET

USPTO serial 78801256

MILLER HEIMAN SOLUTION SET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILLER HEIMAN SOLUTION SET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew D. Francis

MATTHEW D FRANCIS WATSON ROUNDS5371 KIETZKE LNRENO, NV 89511UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software programs for managing sales activities; tape sound recordings, compact disks, video recordings, audio visual recordings, and photographic slide transparencies for use with computers, all in the field of the practice of planning and executing sales situations, training, methodology, and processesACTIVE—
016Books, manuals, brochures, and newsletters all in the field of the practice of planning and executing sales situations, training, methodology, and processesACTIVE—
035Sales performance research, namely, business research regarding sales performances of businesses; providing business information in the field of sales training, methodology, and processesACTIVE—
041Arranging and conducting educational conferences; education in the field of sales training, methodology, and processes rendered through Internet-based correspondence courses; education services, namely, providing training sessions for individuals and groups in the field of sales training, methodology, and processes; educational services, namely, conducting programs in the field of sales training, methodology, and processes; educational speeches relating to the field of sales training, methodology and processes; educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction in the field of sales training, methodology, and processes, and the distribution of course material in connection therewith; education services, namely, conducting online exhibitions and displays and interactive exhibits in the field of sales training, methodology, and processes; instruction in the field of sales training, methodology, and processes; providing courses of instruction at the professional level in the field of sales training, methodology, and processes; publication of documents in the field of sales training, methodology, and processes; publication of texts, journals, pamphlets and newsletters in the field of sales training, methodology, and processes; teaching in the field of sales training, methodology, and processes; training services in the field of sales training, methodology, and processesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance