USPTO serial 78801524
VOODOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VOODOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirsten Severson
VANCOUVER V6K4R8KIRSTEN SEVERSON; KLS TRADEMARK SERVICESPO BOX 19126, 4TH AVE POST,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Personal watercraft, namely, sailing vessels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 7, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |