Drawing for EDIKOS

USPTO serial 78801614

EDIKOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MUNSON OTT, MARY DEIRDRE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDIKOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kao H. Lu

KAO H LU LU & ASSOCIATES PC686 LAWSON AVEHAVERTOWN, PA 19083-4108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Advisory services in the field of product development and quality improvement of software; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for creating searchable databases of information and data; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; Computer services, namely, managing web sites for others; Computer software consultation; Computer software development; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Integration of computer systems and networks; Updating of computer software for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance