USPTO serial 78801990
FLORIDA FISH FRY PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3263627Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLORIDA FISH FRY PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wesley Chapel, FL
Wesley Chapel, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD P. DUTKIEWICZ
EDWARD P. DUTKIEWICZ EDWARD P. DUTKIEWICZPO BOX 937DADE CITY, FL 33526-0937UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | SEASONINGS, NAMELY, ALL PURPOSE SEASONING, [ CAYENNE PEPPER, ] GUMBO FILE; SEASONED BATTER MIXES NAMELY, FISH FRY, CHICKEN FRY, AND SHRIMP FRY; BAKING SEASONINGS FOR CHICKEN AND FISH; CAJUN BLACKENED SEASONING; HUSH PUPPY MIX; [ COCKTAIL SAUCE, TARTAR SAUCE, ] SHRIMP BOILS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jun 21, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 13, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |