USPTO serial 78802088
REVOLUTIONIZING THE FACE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3655965Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 2009
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REVOLUTIONIZING THE FACE OF TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
National Center for Women & Information Technology
Boulder, CO
Other trademarks owned by National Center for Women & Information Technology
National Center for Women & Information Technology
Boulder, CO
Other trademarks owned by National Center for Women & Information Technology
National Center for Women & Information Technology
Boulder, CO
Other trademarks owned by National Center for Women & Information Technology
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leah D. Jackson
Leah D. Jackson MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE, LLPSUITE 5300303 PEACHTREE STREET, N.E.ATLANTA, GA 30308Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, leaflets, prospectus, books, guidelines, manuals, reports, papers and presentations in the field of girls and women in information technology; printed publication, namely, leaflets, prospectus, books, guidelines, manuals, reports, papers and presentations educating the public on the status and progress of girls and women in technology; newsletters promoting issues relevant to girls and women in information technology; and printed publication, namely, leaflets, prospectus, books, guidelines, manuals, reports, papers and presentations of research on girls and women in information technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 22, 2008 |
| 035 | Promoting the public awareness of the need for parity between the sexes in connection with working conditions, pay and opportunities in the information technology workforce; promoting public awareness of the need for parity in the information technology workforce, namely, through educating the public, disseminating information, and advocacy; promoting public awareness of the need for diversity in the workplace and economic and employment opportunities for women in information technology; promoting public awareness of the need to prevent discrimination based on gender in the field of information technology; promoting public awareness of the need to ensure that technology is created by a diverse population; promoting public awareness of the need for gender equity in wages in the field of information technology; promoting public awareness of the need for educational and training opportunities for females in information technology; business research concerning strategies to achieve work force parity in the field of information technology, strategies to attract and retain women to information technology disciplines and careers, the needs of women in information technology, information technology and identifying and evaluating which practices are most effective to achieve the goals of women in information technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 22, 2005 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting workshops and conferences in the field of information technology; educational services, namely, conducting workshops and conferences in the field of science, technology, engineering and mathematics; educational services, namely, conducting workshops and conferences in the field of computer information systems; educational services, namely, conducting workshops and conferences about the effective practices that attract and retain women to information technology disciplines and careers; awards programs for major corporations and individuals who have made significant contributions in the field of information technology; providing on-line publication, namely, leaflets, prospectus, books, guidelines, manuals, reports, papers and presentations in the field of information technology; on-line publications, namely, leaflets, prospectus, books, guidelines, manuals, reports, papers and presentations promoting issues that effect women in information technology; and on-line publications, namely,books, pamphlets, brochures, reports and journals educating the public on the status and progress of women in information technology; educational research concerning the strategies to achieve work force parity in the field of information technology, strategies to attract and retain women to information technology disciplines and careers, the needs of women in information technology, information technology and identifying and evaluating which practices are most effective to achieve the goals of women in information technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 22, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by National Center for Women & Information Technology
- Other trademarks owned by National Center for Women & Information Technology
- Other trademarks owned by National Center for Women & Information Technology
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named REVOLUTIONIZING THE FACE OF TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 6, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |