USPTO serial 78803304
J-350 SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with J-350 SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David V. Radack
DAVID V RADACK ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC600 GRANT ST FL 44PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-2702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Manually operated hand tools, namely, hoes; cultivators; weeding forks; fertilizer scoops; scrapers; garden spoons; lawn edgers; post hole diggers; hand hooks; sod cutter; sod remover, namely, shovels; bulb planter, namely, trowels; axes; hammers; sledge hammers; mattocks; picks; ripping chisels; punches; hand trowels; hand spades; hand cultivators; planter's and landscaper's multi-purpose tool, consisting of a knife and trowel; pruners; grass shears; hedge shears; loppers; saws; pole tree clippers; garden scissors; floral shears; hand hooks for use on bushes; weed cutters; hand hooks for grass; floral snips; bow saws; folding saws; double-edge saws; replacement blades for hand saws; machete corn knives; hand hooks for weeds; snow shovels; snow push shovels; snow scoop shovels; snow roof rakes; ice scrapers; snow sleigh shovel; snow brushes; snow plows; ice chisels and hand scrapers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |