USPTO serial 78803379
DIGITAL OILFIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL OILFIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J. MOORE BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LN FL 4ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for providing business to business e-comrnerce services, namely, computer software for use in facilitating intra-business and inter-business communications through the internet for pricing, contracting, contract administration, invoicing, project coordination, business process integration, task and operations management, workflow coordination and automation, planning, scheduling, procuring and conducting tasks and automation of financial, operation and business workflow processes; computer hardware for business to business e-commerce services, namely, computer terminals and work stations; computer operating systems for business to business e-commerce services | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed materials, namely, instructional and user manuals and work books relating to business to business e-commerce services, namely, intra-business and inter-business communications facilitated through the internet for pricing, contracting, contract administration, invoicing, project coordination, business process integration, task and operations management, workflow coordination and automation, planning, scheduling, procuring and conducting tasks and automation of financial, operation and business workflow processes; writing pads; pens; notebooks; posters; pencils | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | mugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, t-shirts, golf shirts, sweat shirts, hats, jackets, and vests | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | licensing of computer software for business to business e-commerce services, namely, intra-business and inter-business communications relating to receipt coding, authorization of invoices, business processes integration, task and operations management, workflow coordination and automation, planning, scheduling, procuring and conducting tasks, automation of financial, operational and business workflow processes and contract administration | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Computer support services, namely, maintenance of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | provision of business to business e-commerce services by way of a global computer information network and internet site, namely, providing on-line communications links which transfer the website user to other local and global web pages featuring automated financial, operational and business workflow, coordination and management information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing information about computer software and hardware design and development; computer hardware and software consultation, design implementation and integration; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; maintenance of computer software | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIGITAL OILFIELD INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIGITAL OILFIELD
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |