USPTO serial 78803426
E.T. OIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E.T. OIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Oil, petroleum products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |