Drawing for BRICKSTONE CELLARS

USPTO serial 78803750

BRICKSTONE CELLARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRICKSTONE CELLARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells PA575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineACTIVEJun 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 10, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 10, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 17, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 14, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 17, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 4, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 4, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 4, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance