USPTO serial 78804321
TRUE COOL TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 22, 2008
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRUE COOL TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward H. Oldham
20 JAMESON DRIVEDUNDAS, ONTARIO L9H 5A2,CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRIC HAIR ROLLERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2005 |
| 011 | HAIR DRYERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2005 |
| 021 | HAIR BRUSHES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2005 |
| 026 | NON-ELECTRIC HAIR ROLLERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2005 |
| 044 | BEAUTY CONSULTING SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO HAIR TREATMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Michael Victor Vecchiola
- Other trademarks owned by 1682796 ONTARIO INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 1682796 ONTARIO INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 1682796 ONTARIO INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named TRUE COOL TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |