Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78804471?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78804471. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns PATSY'S PIZZERIA?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78804471, the listed owner(s) include: I.O.B. Realty, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78804471?

Serial number 78804471 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark PATSY'S PIZZERIA. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of PATSY'S PIZZERIA?

PATSY'S PIZZERIA (78804471) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover PATSY'S PIZZERIA?

The public record lists International Classes: 030. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78804471

PATSY'S PIZZERIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Feb 1, 2006
Status date: Aug 28, 2025
Registration date: —
Examiner: MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PATSY'S PIZZERIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

I.O.B. Realty, Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by I.O.B. Realty, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRIAN ROFFE

10034 DIAMOND LAKE DRIVEBOYNTON BEACH, FL 33437-5531United States

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
030	Prepared fresh and frozen pizza, to be sold wholesale to grocery stores, supermarkets, delis, and other retail locations; and pizza ingredients, namely, bulk canned pizza sauce, mozzarella, and pre-made refrigerated or frozen pizza dough to be sold wholesale to pizzerias	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 8, 2025	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Sep 8, 2025	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Sep 8, 2025	COAR	TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	—
Sep 8, 2025	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 28, 2025	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 28, 2025	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Aug 28, 2025	EXDD	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED	—
Nov 3, 2022	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Nov 3, 2022	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Nov 3, 2022	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Sep 15, 2022	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Feb 5, 2020	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2020	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Sep 13, 2018	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Sep 12, 2018	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Sep 2, 2018	EWAF	TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS	—
Dec 17, 2013	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Dec 16, 2013	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Nov 6, 2013	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Sep 3, 2013	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jul 29, 2013	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 29, 2013	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 23, 2013	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jul 23, 2013	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jul 23, 2013	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 23, 2013	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jan 23, 2013	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2013	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 29, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 25, 2012	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2012	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2012	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 30, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 30, 2012	ERSI	TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED	—
Nov 30, 2011	CNSI	INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Nov 29, 2011	CNSI	SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN	—
Oct 1, 2011	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Sep 30, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 30, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 30, 2011	ERSI	TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED	—
Mar 31, 2011	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Mar 30, 2011	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Mar 3, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 3, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 3, 2011	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2011	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Mar 3, 2011	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Jan 26, 2011	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2011	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2010	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Dec 7, 2010	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jun 30, 2010	CNSI	INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Jun 29, 2010	CNSI	SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN	—
May 28, 2010	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 28, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 28, 2010	ERSI	TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED	—
Nov 12, 2009	CNSI	INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Nov 11, 2009	CNSI	SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN	—
Oct 15, 2009	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Apr 15, 2009	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Apr 14, 2009	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Mar 24, 2009	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Sep 23, 2008	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Sep 23, 2008	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Jul 21, 2008	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jul 21, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 15, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jul 15, 2008	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Mar 6, 2008	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jan 15, 2008	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Jan 15, 2008	CRML	CORRESPONDENCE MAILED	—
Jan 14, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 14, 2008	UNPR	UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 14, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 14, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2008	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Jul 13, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2007	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jun 15, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 15, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
May 31, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 4, 2006	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Dec 2, 2006	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Nov 1, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 31, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 31, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 20, 2006	MDSC	NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED	—
Feb 7, 2006	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—