USPTO serial 78804687
TODD SMITH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TODD SMITH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini
Jill M. Pietrini Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP11355 W. Olympic BoulevardLos Angeles, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All-purpose sports and athletic bags, fanny packs, backpacks, knapsacks, sports packs, waist packs, gym bags, duffel bags, diaper bags, tote bags, book bags, hand bags, purses, clutch purses, change purses, shoulder bags, carry-on bags, travel bags, garment bags for travel, leather shopping bags, beach bags, satchels, luggage, luggage tags, trunks, suitcases, cosmetic cases sold empty, toiletry cases sold empty, vanity cases sold empty, cosmetic bags sold empty, tool bags sold empty, attaché cases, briefcases, briefcase-type portfolios, men's clutches, business cases, business card cases, credit card cases, calling card cases, leather passport cases, key cases, leather key chains, coin pouches, wallets, billfolds, umbrellas and parasols | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |