USPTO serial 78805192
MICROPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2010
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MICROPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SHANGHAI, CN
SHANGHAI MICROPORT MEDICAL (GROUP) CO., LTD.
SHANGHAI, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHANGHAI MICROPORT MEDICAL (GROUP) CO., LTD.
Microport Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Shanghai, CN
Other trademarks owned by Microport Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Microport Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Shanghai, CN
Other trademarks owned by Microport Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Microport Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Shanghai, CN
Other trademarks owned by Microport Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia I. Reding
Patricia I. Reding Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP90 South Seventh Street2200 Wells Fargo CenterMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Coronary Stents, Drug Eluting Stents, Intracranial (Cerebral) Stents, Carotid Stents, Synthetic Operational Stent Grafts, AAA/TAA Stent Grafts, Angioplasty Balloon Catheters, Distal Protective Devices, namely, filters for use during stent installation and angioplasty, PDA (patent ductus arteriosus) and VSD (ventricular septal defects) and PFO (patent foramen ovale) Occluders | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICROPORT SINICA CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SHANGHAI MICROPORT MEDICAL (GROUP) CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Microport Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Microport Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Microport Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named MICROPORT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 12, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 12, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 8, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 15, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |