USPTO serial 78805847
UNCLE MOISHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNCLE MOISHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farley I. Weiss and Mark H. Weiss
Farley I. Weiss and Mark H. Weiss Weiss & Moy, P.C.4204 North Brown AvenueSCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251-3914UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Baby multiple activity toys; Battery operated action toys; Children's multiple activity toys; Collectable toy figures; Electric action toys; Infant action crib toys; Infant development toys; Infant toys; Mechanical action toys; Mechanical toys; Music box toys; Musical toys; Plastic character toys; Play mats containing infant toys; Play mats for use with toy vehicles; Plush toys; Pop up toys; Positionable toy figures; Radio controlled toy vehicles; Ride-on toys; Rubber character toys; Sandbox toys; Stuffed toys; Talking toys; Toy action figures; Toy action figures and accessories therefor; Toy animals and accessories therefore; Toy building blocks; Toy building blocks capable of interconnection; Toy clocks and watches; Toy figures; Toy furniture; Toy model train sets; Toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as units; Toy music boxes; Toy noisemakers; Toy record players; Toy robots; Toy trains and parts and accessories therefor; Toy vehicles; Toy vehicles and accessories therefor; Toy vehicles with transforming parts; Toy watches; Toy, namely, battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; Toys designed to be attached to strollers and cribs and high chairs and car seats; Wind-up toys; Wind-up walking toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |