CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PYCNOGENOL

USPTO serial 78805893

PYCNOGENOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PYCNOGENOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marvin S. Gittes

MARVIN S GITTES MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY & POPE666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic preparations for the care of the mouth and teeth, namely, toothpaste gels, breath sprays, mouth washes and non-medicated rinses, breath mintsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 26, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 4, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 4, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2009ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 30, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance