Drawing for CRUSH

USPTO serial 78806994

CRUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CRUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Online entertainment services, namely, providing adult-themed photos and videos via the InternetABANDONEDJan 10, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 27, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 27, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Mar 12, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Nov 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance