USPTO serial 78807120
KULL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KULL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick U. Fierst
FREDERICK U. FIERST FIERST, PUCCI & KANE LLP64 GOTHIC STNORTHAMPTON, MA 01060-3042UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | candies; edible cake decorations; bubble gum and chewing gum; breakfast cereals; grits; oatmeal; pancakes and pancake mixes; waffles and waffle mixes; french toast; coffee, and coffee substitutes; cocoa; chocolate and chocolate products, namely, chocolate bars, chocolate candies, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate powder, chocolate syrup, chocolate topping, chocolate truffles, and hot chocolate; tea, and tea substitutes; herbal tea; popcorn, namely, unpopped popcorn, popped popcorn, microwave popcorn, candy coated popcorn and caramel popcorn; grain based chips, namely, corn chips, pita chips, taco chips, and tortilla chips; cheese flavored snacks, namely, cheese curls, puffed cheese balls, and puffed cheese corn snacks; granola and granola bars; rice-based snack foods; snack mixes consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; doughnuts; hushpuppies; baked goods and mixes therefore, namely, crackers, biscuits, bread and buns, bagels, muffins, croissants, crumpets, pastries, cookies, brownies, pies, and cakes; desserts and confections, and mixes therefore, namely, dessert mousse, dessert puddings, dessert soufflés, apple fritters, custards and tapioca; condiments, namely, salt, pepper, mustard, vinegar, pickle relish, ketchup, soy sauce, hot sauce, picante sauce, and seasonings; gravy and gravy mixes; pot pies; ice cream; ice cream substitutes; ice cream cones; ice cream drinks; ice-cream cakes; frozen custard; frozen yoghurt; sorbet; sherbets; milkshakes; flavored ices; gelato; flavorings for beverages; sauces, namely, artichoke, barbecue, cheese, chili, pizza, spaghetti, salsa, and tomato sauces; spices, namely, cinnamon, cinnamon powder, ginger and crystallized ginger, vanilla and vanilla extract; natural sweeteners, namely, sugar, honey, molasses, maple syrup and treacle; dumplings; hamburger sandwiches; hot dog sandwiches; pasta, dried pasta, noodles and dried noodles; pizza; marshmallow and marshmallow topping; salad dressings and mayonnaise; and flavorings for tobacco | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |