USPTO serial 78807425
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian R. Coleman
BRIAN R. COLEMAN PERKINS COIE, LLP101 JEFFERSON DRMENLO PARK, CA 94025-1114UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for creating animation, sound, graphics, presentations, and illustrations; downloadable digital content; content assets and applications that allow users to personalize content and games to play, download, share and exchange; computer software for viewing and playing animation, sound, graphics, presentations, and illustrations; computer software for use in authoring for the web; computer software for enhancing the capabilities of web browser software; computer software for creating, viewing, publishing, producing, broadcasting and playing animation, video, sound, graphics, presentations, imaging, modeling, motion pictures and illustrations; computer software for enhancing the capabilities of web browser software and/or used as a tool for automating, personalizing, designing and updating web sites, web site templates, web site graphics, text and animation for a global computer network, internal and external computer networks, and/or local and/or wide area computer networks; computer software for providing access to, providing information to, and obtaining information from computer networks. | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of data, images, documents and sound via computer networks; providing online electronic bulletin boards and chat rooms for the transmission of messages among computer users; electronic mail services; providing online computer network facilities for real-time interaction and communication with other computer users. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing online facilities for exchanging and distributing digital images, graphic, photos, files and other data via a computer; computer services, namely providing online facilities for creating, viewing, publishing, producing, broadcasting and playing animation, video, sound, graphics, presentations, imaging, modeling, motion pictures and illustrations; computer services, namely, providing online facilities for real-time interaction and communication with other computer users. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |