USPTO serial 78807894
BUZZBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUZZBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald S. Gardner
Donald S. Gardner VAN DYKE, GARDNER, LINN & BURKHART, LLPPO BOX 888695GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49588-8695UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power operated leaf vacuums and wood chippers for brush and tree limbs; pavement vacuums and sweepers for use on roads, streets, sidewalks, driveways and parking lots; material handling conveyors for vehicles, especially trucks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |