USPTO serial 78808312
MAGIC CHILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGIC CHILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Coolers for wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |