USPTO serial 78808645
CHI TOWN IS GUY TOWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3949486Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 2011
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHI TOWN IS GUY TOWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
CHICAGO, IL
CHICAGO, IL
CHICAGO, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-SHIRTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, HATS, SHORTS, SKIRTS, PANTS, SOCKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 2, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nadick, Ryan
- Other trademarks owned by Nadick, Ryan
- Other trademarks owned by Lopez, Jose
- Other trademarks owned by Lopez, Jose
- Other trademarks owned by Rosenburg, Howard
- Other trademarks owned by Rosenburg, Howard
- Other trademarks owned by CHITOWN INNOVATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CHITOWN INNOVATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CHITOWN INNOVATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CHI TOWN IS GUY TOWN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 2, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |