USPTO serial 78808691
INFOPAL INFOPAL BUTTON.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFOPAL INFOPAL BUTTON.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hollywood, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Schwartz; David W. Barman
ROBERT M SCHWARTZ; DAVID W BARMAN ROBERT M SCHWARTZ PAPO BOX 221470HOLLYWOOD, FL 33022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Systems controlled by a microchip bearing records and data processing, and storage of all financial, business practice, management or cost/price determination including but not limited to financial services including banking, bill payment services, cash disbursement services, prepaid services offered through chip containing stored value, deposit access services, stored value services, point of sale and point of transaction electronic payment services, electronic funds transfer services, dissemination of information via a global network, providing micro-payment services for Internet content including electronic documents, photographs, fingerprint and DNA Biometrics information as well as vending machine payment systems, cashless use of amusement, arcade games, game count and casino gaming equipment, medical records and payment information retention, card issuing services, automated teller machine services, closed-system payment/reward point system, services, identification and entry/access | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |