Drawing for XWORX

USPTO serial 78808959

XWORX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3271863Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2007
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XWORX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisabeth H. Coakley / Joseph M. Lafata

Lisabeth H. Coakley / Joseph M. Lafata Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate Drive, Suite 200Troy, MI 48098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Contract manufacturing services in the fields of military and commercial aerospace and transportation goods, namely, aircraft and navigation systems; contract manufacturing services of new products for others in the fields of military and commercial aerospace and transportation goods, namely, aircraft and navigation systemsEXPIRED—
042Advanced research and development services for others in the fields of military and commercial aerospace and transportation goods and services and navigation systems; design, rapid prototyping and testing of new products for others in the fields of military and commercial aerospace and transportation goods and services and navigation systemsEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2018CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 31, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 15, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 31, 2013815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 31, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 16, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance