Drawing for PHOTOCA SS

USPTO serial 78809039

PHOTOCA SS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHOTOCA SS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nils E. Pedersen

Ray Thomas, Jr. Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.1030 15th Street NWSuite 400 EastWashington, DC 20005-1503

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
023Chemical-fiber threads and yarns for textile use; mixed spun threads and yarnsACTIVE—
024Chemical fiber fabrics; mixed fiber fabrics; knitted fabrics; felt and non-woven textile fabrics; towels of textile; Japanese cotton towels; handkerchiefs; Japanese ceremonial wrapping cloth; Japanese general wrapping cloth; table napkins of textile; dish cloths; shower curtains of textile or plasticACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 24, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 21, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 24, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance