Drawing for THE BEST MARGARITAS COME FROM MARGARITAVILLE

USPTO serial 78809819

THE BEST MARGARITAS COME FROM MARGARITAVILLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3314328Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 16, 2007
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE BEST MARGARITAS COME FROM MARGARITAVILLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Smith, Esq., Kristen L. Fancher, Esq., Joel R. Feldman, Esq.

Jeffrey M. Smith, Esq., Kristen L. Fancher, Esq., GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP3333 PIEDMONT ROAD NE, SUITE 2500ATLANTA, GA 30305UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric food and drink blendersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 14, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2018CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 16, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 22, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 22, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 6, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 21, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 7, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 5, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 30, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 30, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance