Drawing for PLANET TV

USPTO serial 78809938

PLANET TV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLANET TV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ava K. Doppelt

AVA K DOPPELT ALLEN, DYER, DOPPELT, MILBRATH & GILCHRI255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401ORLANDO, FL 32801-3460UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Broadcasting programs via a global computer networkACTIVEJul 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 14, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 29, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 21, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 4, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 3, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 3, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 15, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 15, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 18, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 23, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 23, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance