USPTO serial 78810124
AE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HABEEB, MYRIAH A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah Otte Graber, Bruce Tittel, David S. Stallard, J. Robert Chambers, Gregory J. Lunn, Kurt L. Grossman, Clement H. Luken, Jr., Thomas J. Burger, Gregory F. Ahrens, Wayne L. Jacobs, Kurt A. Summe, Kevin G. Rooney, Keith R. Haupt, Theodore R. Remaklus, T
SARAH OTTE GRABER, BRUCE TITTEL, DAVID S CONNELL FOLEY LLP56 LIVINGSTON AVENUEROSELAND, NJ 07068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care products and cosmetics, namely, shaving balm, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving lotion, shower gel, non-medicated lip balm, lip gloss, lipstick, bath gel, bath oil, bath powder, non-medicated bath salts, beauty masks, blusher, body cream, body oil, body powder, bubble bath, cosmetic compacts, hair conditioners, hand cream, night cream, skin cleansing cream, skin cream, deodorant soap, personal deodorants, deodorants and antiperspirants, emery boards, nail enamel, nail polish, eye cream, eye makeup, eye pencils, eyeliners, mascara, facial scrubs, hair lotions, facial lotions, body lotions, hair waving lotions, makeup, facial makeup, massage oil, essential oil for personal use, face powder, talcum powder, hair shampoo, skin clarifiers, skin cleansing cream, skin cleansing lotion, skin lotions, skin moisturizers, skin soap, liquid soaps for hands, face and body, sun block preparations, sun screen preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 8, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |