USPTO serial 78810420
WHITMOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 8, 2008
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with WHITMOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WHITMOR MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
Southaven, MS
SOUTHAVEN, MS
WHITMOR MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
EARLE, AR
Earle, AR
Earle, AR
Earle, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexandra MacKay; Sean P. Ritchie
Alexandra MacKay; Sean P. Ritchie STITES & HARBISON, PLLC401 Commerce St.Suite 800Nashville, TN 37219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL CLOSET ORGANIZER COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES SOLD INDIVIDUALLY, NAMELY, BASKETS, BINS, FREE-STANDING AND STACKABLE BOXES AND STORAGE CUBES | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | LAUNDRY ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HAMPERS AND CLOTHES HANGERS; CLOSET ORGANIZER SYSTEM COMPONENTS, NAMELY, SHOE RACKS, SHELVING, DRAWERS, CHESTS OF DRAWERS, COAT RACKS, HAT RACKS, DRAWER ORGANIZERS FOR CLOTHING ITEMS, KITCHEN UTENSILS AND FLATWARE, AND DRAWER DIVIDERS AND NON-METAL STORAGE BINS; FURNITURE, NAMELY, FREE-STANDING STORAGE CLOSETS; FREE-STANDING STORAGE RACKS, NAMELY, LUGGAGE RACKS FOR INDOOR USE; GARMENT RACKS; CLOSET ORGANIZER SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF BAKERS' RACKS HAVING SHELVES AND BINS FOR FOOD AND HOUSEHOLD STORAGE, OR FOR FOOD PREPARATION AND SERVING, BEING SOLD AS A UNIT; COLLAPSIBLE LUGGAGE RACKS, BEING STANDS FOR LUGGAGE WHEN OPENED | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | CLOSET ORGANIZER COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES SOLD INDIVIDUALLY, NAMELY, WICKER BASKETS, IRONING BOARDS, SHAPED IRONING BOARD COVERS AND SHAPED IRONING BOARD PADS, IRON AND IRONING BOARD CADDIES; CLOTHES PINS, CLOTHES DRYING RACKS, EMPTY SPRAY BOTTLES, ADHESIVE LINT ROLLERS; LINT BRUSHES FOR CLOTHING, ELECTRIC LINT REMOVERS, NAMELY, FABRIC SHAVERS; KITCHEN ORGANIZERS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, DISH DRAINERS, PAPER TOWEL HOLDERS, SPICE RACKS, NON-ELECTRIC KITCHEN CONTAINERS NOT BEING OF PRECIOUS METAL; PORTABLE PLASTIC CONTAINERS FOR STORING HOUSEHOLD AND KITCHEN GOODS IN THE NATURE OF CHINA AND STEMWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | CLOSET ORGANIZER COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES SOLD INDIVIDUALLY, NAMELY, CLOTH AND VINYL STORAGE BAGS FOR CLOTHING; HOUSEHOLD STORAGE BAGS MADE OF FABRIC FOR STORING LAUNDRY; LAUNDRY BAGS; CLOTHES LINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WHITMOR MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WHITMOR, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WHITMOR MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Earle Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Earle Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Earle Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named WHITMOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 29, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 29, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2007 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |