Drawing for ONE LOVE

USPTO serial 78811000

ONE LOVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ONE LOVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Bertone

Steven M Bertone Kirkpatrick Lockhart PRESTON GATES & ELLIS925 Fourth Ave, STE 2900SEATTLE, WA 98104-1158UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed seafood, namely, shrimp, lobster tails, scallops, clams, fish, squid, crabABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 18, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 17, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 8, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 4, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance