Drawing for THE PINNACLE COMPANIES

USPTO serial 78811242

THE PINNACLE COMPANIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PILARO, MARK F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PINNACLE COMPANIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allisen R. Pawlenty-Altman

ALLISEN R PAWLENTY-ALTMAN FOLEY & LARDNER LLP777 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3800MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, mortgage brokerage services, commercial lending services and consumer lending services; title insurance services; real estate services, namely escrow services; investment advice and management; financial services, namely assisting others with the completion of financial transactions for stocks, bonds, securities, annuities and mutual funds; money management services; insurance brokerageACTIVE—
042Real estate services, namely closing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 6, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 6, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 6, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance