USPTO serial 78811623
IMAGIIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAGIIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Culver City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Grace
DAVID W GRACE LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS, GAMES, PLAYTHINGS, AND SPORTING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, INFANT TOYS, CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL TOYS, TOY BLOCK SETS, PLAY CUBES, PULL TOYS, PUSH TOYS, WIND-UP TOYS, BATH TOYS, MECHANICAL TOYS, MUSICAL AND SOUND TOYS, SHAPE SORTER PUZZLES, MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES AND TOYS, BALL AND PEG POUNDERS, ELECTRICAL ACTION TOYS, TOY FIGURES, TOY ANIMALS, TOY VEHICLES, BOATS, SUBMARINES, AIRPLANES, HELICOPTERS, AND ROCKETS, TOY BUILDINGS, TOY FURNITURE, APPLIANCES, AND HOUSEHOLD ITEMS, TOY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, TOY BANKS, CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, IMAGINATIVE PLAY TOYS, TOY SCIENCE AND NATURE SETS, TOY BUG MAGNIFYING JARS, DOLLS, PLUSH TOYS, KITES, JUMP ROPES, SCOOTERS, WATER SQUIRTING TOYS, TOY WEAPONS, TOY SPORTING EQUIPMENT, YO-YOS, RUBBER ACTION BALLS, SPORTS BALLS, BEACH BALLS, FLYING DISCS, INFLATABLE TOYS, BUBBLE MAKING WAND AND SOLUTION SETS, ACTION SKILL GAMES, CARD GAMES, JIGSAW PUZZLES, CHILDREN'S PARTY GAMES, TARGET GAMES, BOARD GAMES, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS, TOY JACKS, BOP BAGS, AND BEACH TOYS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |