Drawing for SAPIEN

USPTO serial 78811663

SAPIEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAPIEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Hughes

Michael J. Hughes IPLO - Intellectual Property Law Offices c/o ZilkaP.O. Box 721120San Jose, CA 95172-1120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software development tools; Computer software for creating an editor and language-independent development environment for use in writing and editing other softwareACTIVEDec 31, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 12, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 12, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 26, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 26, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 26, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 30, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance