USPTO serial 78812207
FOOD CLUB LA COCINA DE MEXICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOOD CLUB LA COCINA DE MEXICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Broccolo
Andrew J. Broccolo Topco Holdings, Inc.150 Northwest Point BlvdElk Grove Village, IL 60007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed jalapenos; jalapeno peppers; canned whole and chopped chiles and chili peppers; canned prepared chili con carne with beans; canned refried beans; canned imitation sour cream; canned chili dips and bean dips; canned menudo soup, canned beef taco filling; vegetable-based soup, Southwest-style canned soups; canned vegetables, canned pickled vegetables, canned fruit, beef stew, Polish sausage, edible oils, corn oil, olive oil, jellies made from fruit and fruit preserves, processed olives, cheese, cream of coconut, processed fruit, namely, fruit cocktail, prepared coconut, processed breadfruit; prepared seafood, namely, shrimp, spiced shrimp, lobster gumbo, canned fish; Puerto Rican sancocho in the nature of a soup primarily comprised of meat and vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Breakfast cereal, corn meal, hominy, crackers, rice, sweet chocolate; spices, namely, salt, pepper, oregano and flavoring extracts; dry taco seasoning mix; dry enchilada sauce mix, dry chili seasoning mix, dry burrito seasoning mix, dry fajita seasoning mix, chili seasoning, burrito seasoning, fajita seasoning; vinegar; packaged taco shells; tostada shells and tortilla chips; taco chips; canned Spanish rice; canned and bottled taco sauce; canned and bottled salsa; canned and bottled picante sauce; canned and bottled enchilada sauce; canned chili relish; canned enchiladas and tamales; canned tomato sauce; canned cheese sauce; tortillas, tortilla chips; tamales; taco dinner kits consisting of taco shells, taco sauce and dry taco seasoning mix; frozen single serving burritos and enchiladas; frozen burritos and enchiladas; frozen Mexican-style foods, namely, single serving burritos consisting of beef, chicken or cheese and beans, entrees consisting of beef, chicken or cheese burritos, chimichangas or enchiladas with beans, and dinners consisting of beef, chicken or cheese burritos, chimichangas or enchiladas with rice and vegetables; jalapeno relish; fruit flavoring syrup, sesame seed flavoring syrup; fruit jellies; mayonnaise; spaghetti, including spaghetti with meatballs; meat sauce; flan custard; pasteles, namely, vegetable pies | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Canned fruit juices, namely apricot nectar, orange juice, grape juice, papaya nectar, peach nectar, guava nectar | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Topco Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Topco Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named FOOD CLUB LA COCINA DE MEXICO
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |